Home
 
 
10 April 2008 @ 08:47 am
World Religions - My Assumptions, part 1  
Sorry I haven't been posting much at all. Life comes at you fast. As I mentioned in the last post, I'm in the middle of a seminar on "world religions" at Real Life called We Are Not Alone. Since I don't have much time to read or think about other stuff (like the books I recently promised to blog through) right now, what I post will probably have to do with world faiths and stuff. At the beginning of the seminar, I wanted to be honest and forthright about my assumptions coming in. There is much that I do not understand about this whole conversation, but like everyone else I have certain assumptions that I bring to the table. Here are some of the most important ones.

What can be known of God is best known by looking at Jesus. This is my way of affirming the uniqueness of Jesus as God's fullest and finalest revelation. Everyone looks at God from somewhere, even the people espousing the whole "all roads lead up the same mountain" (see the poem below). The funny thing about the poem below is that someone is assuming the position of the speaker / observer. And that person makes an implicit claim to know something about God that all the other "religions" miss. I make a similar claim, but I think the answer is not by acting as if we can step outside the historical faiths (which actually involves stepping into yet one more historical faith, this once going by various names: scientific, rationalism, enlightenment, modern, postmodern, etc), but by trusting in Jesus as the way God came to us.

Salvation is about more than what happens to individual humans after they die. First of all, salvation is God's plan for the entire universe. Salvation, for instance, is something creation (or "nature," if you subscribe to the new historical faith mentioned above) looks forward to and will participate in (Romans 8.19-21). Salvation is about all of God's creation being rescued from the disastrous effects of sin. So it is about more than just humans. Humans do nevertheless stand at the center of salvation. This is where the second part comes in; speaking of salvation in terms of humanity, it isn't just about "where we go when we die" (or, more precisely, when Jesus returns). That is certainly important, and I'd never want to deny that at all - like, at all! - but salvation is about freedom from the power of evil and sin and death right here and now. Please understand, I'm not trying to deny the importance of the future, but I am trying to remind us that asking whether a person is "saved" has as much to do with how free they are from sinful ways of thinking and living as it does where they'll go when they die. If anyone cares to ask me to elaborate, feel free and I'll try. (By the way, ARod, I haven't ignored your question; I'm just waiting until I can do it justice.)

God’s saving plan is both “universal” and “particular.” That is to say, everything God does is designed to reach the whole world and all the people in it. He never acts just for this or that group. His plans are as big as the world he created. This is a scandal to some "religious" people who want God to care about only their group. That is also to say, however, that God (for reasons unknown to me) always goes about reaching all people by working in and through particular people (or groups of people). He chose one man out of all the tribes of the earth - Abraham - and promised to bring his blessing through that one family's seed. He remained committed to Israel as his people through whom he would bless the whole world. Etc. So it comes as no difficulty to me to believe that God would remain committed to one person or group as the means through which he will bring salvation to all (or as many as will have it). This is a scandal to many "secular" people, primarily because they fail to recognize that their commitment to universality is but yet another particularity among others.

That's enough for now. I have about five more, but I'll post them bit by bit. Any questions, reflections, or disagreements?

...
 
 
( Post a new comment )
(Anonymous) on April 10th, 2008 07:33 pm (UTC)
Universal and Particular
Hey Michael, another good post. I think that the aspect of incarnational theology is desperately needed in our society. I have had many conversations with people regarding the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's sermon lately and I am baffled as to how many people disagree with it, but also will then make "universal" claims about what God is doing in the earth, of course through their own worlview. Your universal and particular is so important, because it is a message of hope to so many inner city people who have "lost hope that God cares for their particular circumstances and their particular injustices." I think that we need to hear the message that God does not universalize, which usually means the pre-dominant theology or ideology of our "civil religion", because those who are on the fringes will never be accepted into the body of Christ. "The inner sactum of universal religion" is such a opium anyway, that we can't survive with it anymore. Thanks, Paul P.
Thom Stark[info]thomstark on April 23rd, 2008 02:45 am (UTC)
Re: Universal and Particular
Paul P.,

We agree.
(Anonymous) on May 18th, 2008 10:05 am (UTC)
World Religions
Hi, Im from Melbourne Australia.

Most of what you have written above is uninformed psycho-babble (Babel) with no basis in fact or Truth or Reality with a capital T & R.

We live in a time when all the Sacred Scriptures (plus every aspect of their cultural expressions) of the entire Great Tradition are freely available to anyone with an internet connection.

Have you done a comprehensive study of any of them?

If not you are just displaying your own unexamined inherited dim-witted religious provincialism!

And why do you presume that the rantings (and DELUSIONS) of someone in a small tribalistic cult of 2000 years ago is binding on the totality of Humankind?

If the church hadnt been coopted by the Imperial Roman State it probably would have dis-appeared into the dustbin of history. And dont tell that that was part of "god's plan"

A "holy" Empire being the ultimate oxymoron!

What has the tribalistic cultic "god" of Israel got to do with a totally inter-connected multi-cultural world in 2008?

What does "god's plan" have anything do do with 300,000 deaths in a Tsunami, or an earthquake in China, a cyclone in Burma, or the wholesale slaughter of over 100 million human beings in World Wars I & II brought to one and all by the Christian West.

World wars which effectively destroyed global civilization.

Or the fact that thousands of children die every day of mal-nutrition and starvation. Or that world-wide ONE BILLION people now live in slums. And their numbers are increasing every day. Check out Planet of Slums by Miuke Davis.

Or the fact that "christian" America, supposedly the most "religious" country on the planet is easily the world's largest maker, owner, seller, and USER of weapons of all kinds, including WMD'S.

Or the fact that USA "culture" is totally dominated by the "values" of the military-industrial-"entertainment" complex.
Check out a new book titled The Complex by Nick Turse. The "culture" of death quite literally rules in the USA.

Seems like a rather psychotic "plan" is you ask me.